Sterling trucks. Derek trucks. Medium duty trucks. Trucks tv. Hess trucks….

I’m also a c-section mom and an author on the topic. I work really hard at helping c-section moms feel at ease with their decision and cope with having surgery. Its not fair to them to feel that they are less of a mother or a woman.

Please note that I am not for or against having a c-section but am in support of women who need them and I am dedicated to helping them have the best c-section birth that they can, despite having surgery.

Thank you for your great post, all very well said

What we are seeing is a merging of the far Left intent on weakening America and relabeling it “Republican”.

Nobody likes war, but war is sometimes needed. Nobody likes death, but enemies sometimes need to be killed. To disregard that fact is to embrace the Left’s Utopian belief that “If we could just love everyone, they would love us back”—sure, let’s do that.

What Marine would stand with the same people who surely would have thrown bags of urine and feces on our fighting men returning from Vietnam?

He has a name, Adam Kokesh.

Vestigial meridia. Meridia sibutramine. No prescription meridia. Meridia and wellbutrin….

Do you have *any* idea how desperate to convince us you sound? Methinks someone doth protest waaaaaay too much….

Alprazolam from mexico. Alprazolam-mylan. Alprazolam….

and i can certainly buy the possibility of an anti-war conservative candidate. i’ve known many anti-war conservatives; none, incidentally, who were alex jones-type nwo nutcases. it’s a legitimate confluence of positions and i would never make a rule of delegitemizing a conservative for the sake of holding to an antiwar position, or on the basis of any single issue heterodoxy. my conservatism runs deeper than that.

(i would argue that the claim that being antiwar represents some sort of “in” with a lefty constituency is silly. a quick accounting of all of the che gueverra imagery and hamas flags at left-organized “antiwar” rallies serves to demonstrate that the left is not antiwar in principle. besides, progressives haven’t given two turds about the wars since 2005. an antiwar conservative is just a conservative vis a vis any coalition or constituency of the left.)

what i want everyone to do in considering the faithfulness of this kokesh character is to read again the comment left by Anok. now ask yourself this question: where’s cindy sheehan been lately?

you remember cindy sheehan. “mother sheehan”, who used to be paraded around by media benjamin and her castro-ite “code pink” group? maureen dowd conferred unto her “absolute moral authority”. she was the original “human shield” behind which every group from the american friends service committee to the revolutionary communist party would do their part to spread bogus war crimes stories and blockade domestic supply routs.

today, if you ask a progressive who knows what they think about “mother sheehan”, they’ll tell you: “who gives a flying f**k about that crazy bitch?”

the reason is because cindy sheehan evolved away from the left and into the paleo-libertarian fold. there was in this some sordid backstory about boinking lew rockwell, but it’s not my point to question the rational-ness of her migration from left to right.

my point is that ivaw was a marxist outfit, stewarded into existence by veterans of the vvaw, which itself was a construction of the maoist revolutionary union. it was a component of the same bogus “antiwar” movement of the left which was spearheaded by stalinist and attorney to saddam hussein, ramsey clarke.

if kokesh is now, by some turn, a paleo-libertarian antiwarrior, the rout he took was through the colon of the smelliest, stinkiest annals of the extreme left. if he made that intellectual journey, it’s worth interrogating what smelly, stinky, alex jones-ey rightwing nonsense he found compellingly radical enough to follow. and, for that matter, it’s worth questioning whether he made that journey in earnest at all.

and it’s worth questioning these things even if his is a doomed and conventionally inconsequential dark horse campaign, because it’s important to know who is trying to insinuate themselves into conservative politics and why.

Adam served with distinction in the Marines. It was from actual, real live combat and comprehension that he has arrived at his positions. To say he dishonors the military ‘because’ he served proudly and bravely could only be said by someone lacking in their own courage, conviction or actual experience. He honors his brothers in the field, who are nothing but paeons for political chess players who don’t give a rat’s ass about our troops. When’s the last time you were on scene when a proud, brave soldier died, for nothing?

For the mental midget who bemoaned a flag being flown upsidedown–it’s NOT desicration…it’s the standard sign of DISTRESS. Adam knows the shape this nation is in.

To suggest Adam’s activism is somehow a ‘bad’ thing, could only be suggested by an armchair wanna-be. It’s because of people like this (party voters) who brought this nation to her knees…are you happy now? If you’re one, I’d suggest you are too much “Republican”–not enough American.

For some asshat to say something of saving piss in the fridge, does nothing but expose a lack of substance in arguing for/against Adam’s positions.

To say Adam isn’t a “Republican”, or a good man of his convictions, is to say “yes” means “no”. Only someone who doesn’t agree that Dr. Paul is the only real Republican in Congress, could come up with such tripe.

By the way, after working for President Reagan, and years of the “My team, right or wrong” nonsense, I recognized that the party left me.

Unlike Dr. Paul or Adam, I wasn’t willing to ‘help clean up the party’, to me, even if you clean up a cesspool–you still have a cesspool. From my perspective, there is absolutely no difference between a Republican or a Democrat.

You who are married to the cesspool should be VERY grateful that Dr. Paul or Adam are willing to speak the truth and stand up for America, ’cause if you don’t want them, we’d be privileged to have them.

Why not stop bad-mouthing, and just ask the questions you want answered, then make a personal choice?

That’s when I supported him. Not now.

Now I have to go brush my teeth, as agreeing with Malkin leaves a bad taste in my mouth. But it is prudent to give credit where credit is due.

I don’t believe ANY branch of the conservative movement has had enough of an impact in New Mexico to break any hearts here.

A point of matter, neo-cons are not true conservatives in my opinion. They are internationalists at their core.

Is that a lie good enough for you or no?

http://thisainthell.us/blog/?p=1879

kokesh is no republican

And anyone who could vote to send a guy who stores his piss in a fridge to Congress deserves whatever they get.

“she should keep her nose out of New Mexican politics because we’ve had enough heart-break from the neo-cons to last us a life-time”

but I don’t agree.

I DO think Michelle Malkin needs to butt out of New Mexico politics and let the people here decide the election — BUT I don’t think the “neo-cons” have been breaking hearts in New Mexico – I don’t believe ANY branch of the conservative movement has had enough of an impact in New Mexico to break any hearts here. The heart-breakers in New Mexico have always been the Democrats, who have been dragging this state down for years now.

We need to stand our ground, and I for one will never vote for someone who is capable of marching with an upside-down flag.

Secondly, she should keep her nose out of New Mexican politics because we’ve had enough heart-break from the neo-cons to last us a life-time.

I have been trying to get some sleep, but it is not working out terribly well. I may have to give up that hobby again.

Oh well, I guess I’ll just have to look forward to the day (2010) when my grandson is hatched. I’ll get to spoil him rotten and feed him full of sugar and pass him off to his mommy. That’ll teach her for being as headstrong as me.